Results 1 - 10 of about 2,150,000 for raspberry video

[Sharron]

:mrgreen: http://www.google.com/search?q=raspberry%20video&sourceid=mozilla-search&start=0&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:offici (http://www.google.com/search?q=raspberry%20video&sourceid=mozilla-search&start=0&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:offici)

[donecweb]

Congrats real cute.

[Sharron]

Thanxs, saw the search in my stats followed it and what a surprise. #1
That is not the first search for Raspberry video, lol. There are more people out there with minds like mine. lol

Now if I can figure out how to get the darn page to validate. You don't know of another way of doing a video page that validates do you? lol

Found a work around for Flash on List A Part Article #154, others for flash but not for video clips.


Hey Today I am A MASTER MEMBER!

[webado]

Try this:


<object id="MediaPlayer1" width="320" height="285" type="application/x-mplayer2" data="http://designbyatfb.com/temp-images/raspberry.wmv" >
<param name="filename" value="http://designbyatfb.com/temp-images/raspberry.wmv">
<param name="autoStart" value="True">
<param name="AnimationatStart" value="true">
<param name="TransparentAtStart" value="false">
<param name="ClickToPlay" value="0">
<param name="bgcolor" value="#000000">
<param name="loop" value="false">
</object>


The video itself is 320x240. The extra height up to 285 is for the player controls.

I believe this validates. I know it plays in IE & FF & Netscape. Opera, as usual, is out to lunch on this. To hell with Opera. :lol:

[orz]

Hey Today I am A MASTER MEMBER!

I guess that means you have the right to raspberry whenever and where ever you want ;-)

[Sharron]

IT WORKS! LOL, HAPPY HAPPY, :lol:

now to decide to keep or dump the guesbook. It does not validate, doesn't seem to help my silktide score, hurts more then helps and no one is paying much attention to it.

Christina and JWJ are the only folks who have signed it! sigh...............

What do you think, keep or dump?

[China Tea]

Christina and JWJ are the only folks who have signed it! sigh...............

Not anymore . . .

Give the guestbook time. . . (especially now that I signed it!)

Loved the site . . . and you are so cute and fun! I read your "about me" and I thought you are so interesting.

[JWJ]

Personal opinion ... if I had to choose between the treasures I have collected in my Guestbook or a better Silktide score, I'd choose the Guestbook. I think it is always adviseable to try and make pages that validate but I don't believe validation should dictate what we do or don't have on our site. We get too hung up on 'doing things the proper way' ... divs instead of tables for instance. We put more effort into making sure our code is 100% perfect than we do in trying to make sure out text is grammatically correct. Yet our visitors read our text and see nothing of our code. Aim to validate, yes ... be ruled by it, no way.

Keep the guestbook!!!

Just my view, for what it's worth.
;-)

[Sharron]

You guys are just too nice. Jonra, I am so sure that all your upgrading was well deserved someone sticking their tongue out at you.

Yes I am childish.

China, you are so kind, thanks for signing my book. ah ha, the about me page, I could be described as a bit of a oxymoron.

JWJ, yeah I agree. sigh yet again.

[webado]

Well, let's see just why it doesn't validate, shall we?

Basically it is because you have added the guestbook index.php contents to another file so the end result that's rendered ends up with 2 doctypes and 2 head sections.

Also, if you notice it's not showing properly in Firefox - it's centered on the page, not within the container you wanted it to be in. IN IE it shows up where you want it to - I guess.

If you wanted to show the guestbook inside a page of yours, then you have to show it in an iframe (or otherwise use frames, which is not recommended).

[Sharron]

Have you ever heard the expressions:

Ignorance is Bliss and or Ignorance is no excuse.?

I have removed all my stuff from the guest book page! It tentively validates.

I was not able to extract a character encoding labeling from any of the valid sources for such information. Without encoding information it is impossible to reliably validate the document. I'm falling back to the "UTF-8" encoding and will attempt to perform the validation, but this is likely to fail for all non-trivial documents.


But I need to fix some code? http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.designbyatfb.com%2Fgboo k%2Findex.php

As it is php I am not so sure where the the culprit is. But I am looking!

Thanks Christina!

[China Tea]

Sharron wrote:

Ignorance is no excuse

While I am very comfortable being ignorant, I will follow your lead, little one . . .

Can anyone tell me what happens when a page does not validate? I know the literal meaning of the word validate but I do not know the circumstance of a web page not validating . . .:oops:

[webado]

Have you ever heard the expressions:

Ignorance is Bliss and or Ignorance is no excuse.?

I have removed all my stuff from the guest book page! It tentively validates.

I was not able to extract a character encoding labeling from any of the valid sources for such information. Without encoding information it is impossible to reliably validate the document. I'm falling back to the "UTF-8" encoding and will attempt to perform the validation, but this is likely to fail for all non-trivial documents.


But I need to fix some code? http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.designbyatfb.com%2Fgboo k%2Findex.php

As it is php I am not so sure where the the culprit is. But I am looking!

Thanks Christina!

How did you make that file? The original /gbook/index.php did not contain those elements of customization. You added to it your stuff at the top and maybe at the bottom I think.

[Arne]

Can anyone tell me what happens when a page does not validate? I know the literal meaning of the word validate but I do not know the circumstance of a web page not validating

Validating a page is to check for errors in the code. If the page don't validate, there is errors that may or may not make a "mess" of the page content for at least some visitors. What can happend depends on the errors and browsers visiting the page. There is not simple and short way to tell everything in a few words. :)

In this case, when there is no character encoding set by neither the server or by the author in a META tag, the visiting browsers will use whatever character encoding the user have set as their default. That can make the content more or less unreadable for some of the visitors, depending also with what character encoding was used when the file was writed, saved and uploaded.

[webado]

There are also coding errors which may hamper bots from properly indexing the site, despite it seeming to show OK whan you check it in many browsers.

I occasionally have an error whereby a bot goes into an infinite loop trying to crawl my site. Yet I have no problem navigating it myself in any browser.
This is when I have to see what happens to a non-javascript enabled critter like a bot. Will it get stuck? They do appear to get stuck on pages that rely on certain types of redirects it seems.

I think this is why I have a Googlebot that's taken permanent residence in one of my dead forums - he can't find his way out again :lol:

[jonra01]

Can anyone tell me what happens when a page does not validate? I know the literal meaning of the word validate but I do not know the circumstance of a web page not validating . . .:oops: If you page does not validate you will be banned for life from all WofA (Webmasters of America) conventions. Then the W3C police will come to your home and beat you with discarded printer cables until you promise to never again publish a non-validated page.

That's if you are lucky. If you are unlucky, the page will cause your computer to blow up with enough force to level one city block.




:lol:

[Sharron]

How did you make that file? The original /gbook/index.php did not contain those elements of customization. You added to it your stuff at the top and maybe at the bottom I think.

Chris I didn't know that when I used my own page with my own css, (and inserted the php code into a content div), that the php code for the guest book also had a doc type, it's own css and so on.

I don't know how to read php code, so could not tell it was going to add that after it was uploaded to the web. (you can't tell what the php code will result in once uploaded).

So I just deleted all of my own stuff. The page that is uploaded now is the original guest book code, with my own images replacing the original ones.

It still does not 100% validate, the character codeing may or may not be why. I have tried every combination on the WC3 page. Each combination results in different results, but none really valid.

It must be something in the php code, something I can't see.

China Tea Jonra is kidding you about the ramifications of not having valid code. Nothing bad happens, unless your stuff is so far off it doesn't work!

[webado]

You either removed the character encoding line or it was never there.

I think there's an option in the guestbook admin function to define the character encoding - unless I'm dreaming it.

Indeed you have it as soon as you get into admin.php;

For Encoding just put utf-8 .

[JWJ]

China Tea Jonra is kidding you about the ramifications of not having valid code. Nothing bad happens, unless your stuff is so far off it doesn't work!
Phew!!! Thank God for that.... scared the life out of me!!! :-|

[webado]

Sharron, wacha waitin' fer to make dat change in de guestbook admin ? :lol:

[Sharron]

Sharron, wacha waitin' fer to make dat change in de guestbook admin ? :lol:

Well, errrrrrrrrrrrrrr, hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. Waiting for? ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh maybe for errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. something! lol

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.designbyatfb.com%2Fgboo k%2Findex.php

Yeah for you, you are too darn smart.

And yes it was in the admin section of the stuff. lol Now can I put my other stuff back? lol

[webado]

Not so fast. Don't touch the guestbook files.

Instead of including the guesbook inde.php file in a div you include it in an iframe in that div.

And you keep the resulting file in your regular root folder.

But I'd have to see what you had before to see how it can be done in as painless a manner as possible.

[fuzzy]

JWJ,

I agree! About as far as I go is a general page-check, which usually helps me find stray tags that somehow got inserted. Nonetheless, I have made it a habit to try to improve my coding wherever possible, adding image ALTs and TITLEs and such. And I continue to revise and improve my website, constantly moving toward using universal CSS on all pages, but still with a long way to go!

(By the way, thanks to those who answered my menu question, but I think I'll hold off on that for a while.)

Love the video Sharron!!!

[Sharron]

http://www.designbyatfb.com/gbook/Aindex.php

If you use FF with developers tools you will see the two css files. The top one named admin.css is the php css inline styles that belong there. (the css that actually originated with the guest book)
Inline Styles from http://www.designbyatfb.com/gbook/Aindex.php


The second one (mine) that does not belong there is called gbook-index.css
http://www.designbyatfb.com/gbook/gbook-index.css (http://www.designbyatfb.com/gbook/gbook-index.css)


Of course now, there is an error showing at the top of the page. Something to do with headers.

[webado]

Sharron - please email these files to me zipped since I cannot see the contents of a php script online, only the html it produces.

The error is due to an attempt at performing a redirection but after screen output has already been produced (even a single blank character counts as screen output, a doctype line, anything before the redirection function).

[Sharron]

#3 of it appears to be 37 thousand 300 results #11 on us google

strange strange, ebook2 is the alt tag and or name of a image, one image on that page.


http://www.google.co.kr/search?q=ebook2&hl=ko&lr=&newwindow=1&start=10&sa=N

[webado]

Holy molly! I cannot click that link at all - IE freezes completely and I have to kill it using Task Manager and it results in an error. Must be the Korean characters somehow, but I have no idea what - I'm not clicking on them after all!

Anyway, I copied just the Google link and opened it in a new window - great show, Sharron!