Results 1 - 10 of about 2,150,000 for raspberry video

[Sharron]

http://www.google.com/search?q=raspberry%20video&sourceid=mozilla-search&start=0&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-USffici

[donecweb]

Congrats real cute.

[Sharron]

Thanxs, saw the search in my stats followed it and what a surprise. #1
That is not the first search for Raspberry video, lol. There are more people out there with minds like mine. lol

Now if I can figure out how to get the darn page to validate. You don't know of another way of doing a video page that validates do you? lol

Found a work around for Flash on List A Part Article #154, others for flash but not for video clips.


Hey Today I am A MASTER MEMBER!

[webado]

Try this:

[html]
<object id="MediaPlayer1" width="320" height="285" type="application/x-mplayer2" data="http://designbyatfb.com/temp-images/raspberry.wmv" >
<param name="filename" value="http://designbyatfb.com/temp-images/raspberry.wmv">
<param name="autoStart" value="True">
<param name="AnimationatStart" value="true">
<param name="TransparentAtStart" value="false">
<param name="ClickToPlay" value="0">
<param name="bgcolor" value="#000000">
<param name="loop" value="false">
</object>
[/html]

The video itself is 320x240. The extra height up to 285 is for the player controls.

I believe this validates. I know it plays in IE & FF & Netscape. Opera, as usual, is out to lunch on this. To hell with Opera.

[orz]

Originally Posted by Sharron

Hey Today I am A MASTER MEMBER!

I guess that means you have the right to raspberry whenever and where ever you want

[Sharron]

IT WORKS! LOL, HAPPY HAPPY,

now to decide to keep or dump the guesbook. It does not validate, doesn't seem to help my silktide score, hurts more then helps and no one is paying much attention to it.

Christina and JWJ are the only folks who have signed it! sigh...............

What do you think, keep or dump?

[China Tea]

Christina and JWJ are the only folks who have signed it! sigh...............

Not anymore . . .

Give the guestbook time. . . (especially now that I signed it!)

Loved the site . . . and you are so cute and fun! I read your "about me" and I thought you are so interesting.

[JWJ]

Personal opinion ... if I had to choose between the treasures I have collected in my Guestbook or a better Silktide score, I'd choose the Guestbook. I think it is always adviseable to try and make pages that validate but I don't believe validation should dictate what we do or don't have on our site. We get too hung up on 'doing things the proper way' ... divs instead of tables for instance. We put more effort into making sure our code is 100% perfect than we do in trying to make sure out text is grammatically correct. Yet our visitors read our text and see nothing of our code. Aim to validate, yes ... be ruled by it, no way.

Keep the guestbook!!!

Just my view, for what it's worth.

[Sharron]

You guys are just too nice. Jonra, I am so sure that all your upgrading was well deserved someone sticking their tongue out at you.

Yes I am childish.

China, you are so kind, thanks for signing my book. ah ha, the about me page, I could be described as a bit of a oxymoron.

JWJ, yeah I agree. sigh yet again.

[webado]

Well, let's see just why it doesn't validate, shall we?

Basically it is because you have added the guestbook index.php contents to another file so the end result that's rendered ends up with 2 doctypes and 2 head sections.

Also, if you notice it's not showing properly in Firefox - it's centered on the page, not within the container you wanted it to be in. IN IE it shows up where you want it to - I guess.

If you wanted to show the guestbook inside a page of yours, then you have to show it in an iframe (or otherwise use frames, which is not recommended).